Skip to content

Update storage-persistent-storage-fsGroup.adoc #89662

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update storage-persistent-storage-fsGroup.adoc #89662

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

dpateriya
Copy link
Contributor

@dpateriya dpateriya commented Mar 5, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Added space for the NOTE

FROM fsGroupChangePolicyfield

TO fsGroupChangePolicy field

Version(s):
OCP 4.15+
Issue:
Added space for the NOTE

Link to docs preview:
https://89662--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/storage/understanding-persistent-storage.html#using_fsGroup_understanding-persistent-storage

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

@dpateriya
Update storage-persistent-storage-fsGroup.adoc
5bf707b 
Added space for the NOTE

FROM  fsGroupChangePolicyfield 

TO  fsGroupChangePolicy field
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 5, 2025
@dpateriya
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Mar 5, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Mar 5, 2025 •
edited
Loading

🤖 Thu Mar 06 14:58:40 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://89662--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_storage/understanding-persistent-storage-microshift.html
https://89662--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-dedicated/latest/storage/understanding-persistent-storage.html
https://89662--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/storage/understanding-persistent-storage.html
https://89662--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-rosa-hcp/latest/storage/understanding-persistent-storage.html
https://89662--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-rosa/latest/storage/understanding-persistent-storage.html

@JoeAldinger JoeAldinger added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Mar 5, 2025
@JoeAldinger JoeAldinger self-assigned this Mar 5, 2025
JoeAldinger
JoeAldinger reviewed Mar 5, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@JoeAldinger JoeAldinger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

missing back ticks

@JoeAldinger JoeAldinger added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Mar 5, 2025
@JoeAldinger JoeAldinger removed their assignment Mar 5, 2025
@dpateriya
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Mar 6, 2025
@xenolinux xenolinux added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR and removed merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Mar 6, 2025
xenolinux
xenolinux reviewed Mar 6, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@xenolinux xenolinux left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Peer review suggestion needs to be applied.

Removing the label now. Please add it back once PR is ready. Thanks.

@xenolinux xenolinux removed the merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR label Mar 6, 2025
@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 6, 2025

@dpateriya: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 5, 2025
@openshift-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jul 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@xenolinux xenolinux xenolinux left review comments

@JoeAldinger JoeAldinger JoeAldinger left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@dpateriya @ocpdocs-previewbot @openshift-bot @xenolinux @JoeAldinger